<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lencioni: Arguing for Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workingknowledge.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workingknowledge.com/blog/?p=1065</link>
	<description>Accelerating your business success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:13:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anniehu123</title>
		<link>http://workingknowledge.com/blog/?p=1065&#038;cpage=1#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator>anniehu123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingknowledge.com/blog/?p=1065#comment-2011</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great post.  A lot of times you’d notice in a team setting, there are always a couple of people who are vocal and creative, tend to talk more than some people who are timid but engaged.  There are lots of good assessment tools such as HBDI, DiSC (just to name a few) that are also helpful to any team development.  And having an experienced facilitator to co-lead and set up ground rules (don’t take personal attack personal)/process (why/what/how) will help keep the healthy debate on the right track, encourage timid team members to participate in the debate and assist the team in producing tangible results.  

Thanks again for taking the time to share your insight.  Wish you all the best for your continued success.   @anniehu123</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great post.  A lot of times you’d notice in a team setting, there are always a couple of people who are vocal and creative, tend to talk more than some people who are timid but engaged.  There are lots of good assessment tools such as HBDI, DiSC (just to name a few) that are also helpful to any team development.  And having an experienced facilitator to co-lead and set up ground rules (don’t take personal attack personal)/process (why/what/how) will help keep the healthy debate on the right track, encourage timid team members to participate in the debate and assist the team in producing tangible results.  </p>
<p>Thanks again for taking the time to share your insight.  Wish you all the best for your continued success.   @anniehu123</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Meyer</title>
		<link>http://workingknowledge.com/blog/?p=1065&#038;cpage=1#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingknowledge.com/blog/?p=1065#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>Exactly on the mark, Christian, thanks for your (well-phrased) expansion! I&#039;ll add that often having more information (rather than less) helps keep the focus on the facts.  And injecting humor into the conversation now and then helps lighten the mood as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly on the mark, Christian, thanks for your (well-phrased) expansion! I&#8217;ll add that often having more information (rather than less) helps keep the focus on the facts.  And injecting humor into the conversation now and then helps lighten the mood as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian DE NEEF</title>
		<link>http://workingknowledge.com/blog/?p=1065&#038;cpage=1#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian DE NEEF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingknowledge.com/blog/?p=1065#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>Of course, conflict is good!  But it has to be a disagreement of ideas, not of people...  Whenever the conflict turns interpersonal, the trick is to separate the ideas from the people!  The conflict arises from diversity of opinion.  It has to be a conversation, not a dispute.  The conversation leads (sometimes) to innovation.  The dispute leads (all too often) to standstill.  


@cdn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, conflict is good!  But it has to be a disagreement of ideas, not of people&#8230;  Whenever the conflict turns interpersonal, the trick is to separate the ideas from the people!  The conflict arises from diversity of opinion.  It has to be a conversation, not a dispute.  The conversation leads (sometimes) to innovation.  The dispute leads (all too often) to standstill.  </p>
<p>@cdn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

